Many parents think that watching TV can let children learn knowledge, and good TV programs can replace reading, so that is, children hold TV to watch endlessly. Is it true? Come and have a look!
Good TV programs can replace reading?
Wang Xiao is a kindergarten teacher. Once, she asked the children who had seen the Disney Classic Animation snow white. All the children in the class raised their hands. Then Wang Xiao asked the children to describe the image of snow white. As a result, the snow white described by the children was almost the same. Wang Xiao asked them, how do you know Snow White looks like this? Children say it’s on TV.
Wang Xiaoxin has a hidden worry, because she remembers that when she was a child, the kindergarten teacher asked them the same question. At that time, all the children in the class rushed to say what snow white looked like in their mind. Basically, what each child described was different. It turns out that some of the snow white they know are told by their parents in their stories and some are read in books.
Without the specific image on the screen, children will play their imaginations according to their own understanding. As their experience increases, Snow White’s image in their hearts will continue to enrich and change. But now, in order to cater to children’s ideas, many children’s plays are relatively simple. Children will think that a fairy tale character has grown up like this, which will solidify their thinking.
A lot of things depend on children’s imagination and understanding. If they watch more intuitive TV or animation, children will form a fixed way of thinking, which will greatly weaken their imagination, and it will be difficult to upgrade to another height in the future.
Some people must have said that how smart the children are now. They know everything. Even the parents are struck dumb. Of course, this is part of the role of television. It’s true that children seem to be more eloquent than each other, and they seem to know a lot. But these are nothing more than information, not necessarily the true wisdom of children. Knowledge is not the carrier of life, wisdom is.
Some of the information, though fast-food, is still good, but the most terrible ones are those programs that poison teenagers, which cause them to lose their initiative, exploration spirit, and even degenerate. No wonder some people say that “cultural programs such as junk TV are the first weapon to destroy a country and the whole world.” American educator Jim triles believes that the image of TV and computer will affect children’s concentration. Children who keep watching TV and computer for about three hours a day will have lower reading ability.
Why do you say that? What are the differences between reading and TV programs?
One is that reading takes a long time to stay focused, while TV programs are fragmented, which does not require children to focus for a long time.
Second, reading requires children to absorb information on their own initiative, while watching TV only requires passive reception of information.
Third, when children are reading, there are many reasons in their mind, and why they can find answers in reading. However, TV didn’t give children the opportunity to ask questions and think, and the results came out soon.
Fourth, compared with reading, the vocabulary taught by TV is very small. Excellent children’s books use twice as complex a language as TV. So reading brings much more knowledge than watching TV.
Fifth, the process of reading is the process of constantly exerting one’s imagination and experiencing the artistic conception described in the book, which is a high-level enjoyment. The visual picture of TV greatly limits the imagination space of children. Although it meets the needs of children’s sense, it is difficult to have a profound impact.
In addition, TV also has a disadvantage that it deprives children of the opportunity to communicate with their families. According to the survey, most children spend half their time watching TV. When watching TV, no matter adults or children, they don’t talk. This shows how much impact TV has on children’s reading.
For children’s reading and growth, adults should let children watch TV in moderation. The American Academy of Pediatrics has a suggestion on how to control it. They said that children under two years old should not watch any TV programs, because at this time, children’s brain development must be generated through interaction with people or objects, not just passive reception of TV messages. For some older children, the time of watching TV should be limited to 10 hours in a week.
A survey shows that when children watch TV for less than 10 hours a week, their study will not only be affected, but also help. But beyond that time, children’s academic performance will decline.
The most effective way to deal with children’s TV watching is to let them form the habit of reading. When a child feels the pleasure of reading, then he can put the time of watching TV on reading.
In addition, you can make a schedule at home, such as how long you can only watch TV every day, which channels you can only watch, and which TV programs you can only watch. Beyond this plan, children have to spend hours doing homework, reading and playing. The arrangement of this schedule can be consulted with the children. When children read, parents are better to read with them. We should know that the power of role models is infinite. The children are reading quietly, while the parents are sitting and watching TV, which is not convincing.
The above is the knowledge about whether watching TV can replace reading introduced by Xiaobian. We can know that TV can’t replace reading, and don’t let TV occupy reading time. If you are interested in children’s home electric shock prevention knowledge, please go to this safety net to find relevant information.